1. Why does Frege say 'the concept horse is not a concept'?
2. How problematic is it to endorse the above?
3. How much does the linguistic turn influence the moves here?
4. What is what Parons calls Frege's strict theory about the functioning of ordinary language?
5. Is this strict theory flawed, and why?
6. What is Parsons solution to the concept horse problem? What do you think of it?
7. Is the concept horse a concept?
No comments:
Post a Comment